Skip to main content
Strategy

The Authenticity Filter: Why Being Yourself is Your Best Hiring Strategy

· By Tobias Riedling · 4 min read

The Authenticity Filter

Imagine interviewing two engineers in the same afternoon. Sarah carried a degree from a state school and eyes that lit up when she described the kernel driver she hacked together over the weekend "just to see if I could." Michael’s résumé read like a recruiter’s fantasy: Stanford, Kubernetes, leadership certificates, perfect jargon. Traditional hiring wisdom crowns Michael. Years of observation says Sarah is the safer bet.

Why? Because the best hiring strategy isn’t spotting “the best” people. It’s building a workplace so real that the right people rush in and the wrong ones sprint away.


1. The Interview Paradox

Interviews are theater. Candidates pretend they have no weaknesses; companies pretend every challenge is “an opportunity.” Both parties leave with PowerPoint versions of the truth and hope reality won’t be awkward later.

Reality is always awkward later.

The paradox is that the harder you try to impress, the less useful the signal becomes. Anyone can memorize behavioral‑question flash cards. Very few will write kernel drivers for sport.


2. Authenticity as a Two‑Way Filter

Biologists call it a costly signal: the warning colors on a poisonous frog work precisely because they're dangerous to display. The frog essentially announces: "I'm so confident in my defense that I don't need to hide." Authenticity works the same way. When a company exposes its messy codebase or its chaotic product roadmap, it risks scaring people off—and that risk is what makes the message trustworthy.

The filter runs in both directions. Candidates who love the mess move closer. Candidates who need polish retreat before payroll ever meets them. Both sides avoid expensive mistakes.


3. The Credential Trap

We keep using school names and GPA as proxies for competence because measuring competence is hard. Google’s own Project Oxygen found academic pedigree dead last among predictors of success.¹ The Terman Study tracked children with off‑the‑charts IQ and discovered that most lived unremarkable lives, while two who scored below the cutoff—Shockley and Alvarez—won Nobel Prizes.²

Credentials are paint. Capability is the engine. Buying by the paint job remains popular only because the hood is harder to open.


4. The Passion Paradox

Passion is the sharpest predictor of performance—and the easiest lever for exploitation. The same Saturday hacker who drives 10× output will also drive herself into Sunday burnout if you reward her devotion with only pizza and slogans.

Authentic cultures pay in proportion to passion. Mercenary cultures pay in pizza. The difference shows up on the balance sheet a year later.


5. Lessons From Unexpected Places

Military historian Martin van Creveld explained why some units outperform better‑equipped enemies.³ Two ideas translate cleanly to software:

  • Mission‑type tactics: Tell people what must be achieved, not how.
  • Cohesion: Keep people who share context and values in the same foxhole.

Replace foxholes with Slack channels and you get Google’s research on psychological safety: autonomy plus trust beats top‑down brilliance.


6. Implementing the Filter

For Companies

  1. Write the brutal job post. “You’ll inherit a codebase that looks like raccoons wrote it at 3 a.m.”
  2. Ask the weekend question. “What did you build when nobody was paying you?”
  3. Pay for a real test. One paid week on an actual ticket reveals more than twelve whiteboard riddles.

For Candidates

  1. Ask what sucks. If the answer is a slogan, leave.
  2. Probe the passion boundary. Is overtime rewarded or assumed?
  3. Picture your future self. Can you still recognize that person after eighteen months here?

"We can't write that—Legal will have a heart attack."

Brutal honesty meets employment law, and usually law wins. But compliance doesn't require fiction. Instead of "fast-paced environment" (code for chaos), try "We ship daily, break things weekly, and fix them by Friday." Instead of listing impossible requirements, write "You'll need three of these five—tell us which ones you bring."

The trick: Be honest about challenges without creating legal liability. "Our codebase needs refactoring" beats "Our code is a dumpster fire." Both are true. Only one keeps HR calm.


8. The Uncomfortable Truths

Authenticity requires privilege. Not everyone can risk honesty when visas, rent, or bias are on the line. That makes authentic workplaces more—never less—urgent.

Most leaders can’t handle authenticity. They were promoted for confidence theater, not candor. They get mercenaries because mercenaries can stomach theater.

The filter reveals character but doesn’t fix it. An authentic jerk is still a jerk. At least you see him coming.


9. The ROI of Reality

Traditional hiring burns money in hidden ways: training the wrong hire, losing them to boredom, patching the morale they poison on the way out. Cultures that practice radical honesty spend less because mismatches are filtered before day one.


10. The Mutual Challenge

Companies: For your next three roles, trade polish for truth. Pay passionate people like owners. Make room for magnificent weirdos.

Candidates: For your next three interviews, interrogate reality. Choose places that let you keep your soul even if the salary is smaller. The compound interest on alignment dwarfs a 10 % raise.

Measure results a year from now. The numbers will do the arguing for you.


11. When the Masks Drop

Eventually every mask slips. Better that it happens before the contract is signed. An organization that is real about its flaws attracts people real about their strengths—and that pairing beats any pedigree.

The only unscalable strategy left is authenticity. Everything else has already been automated.


References

  1. Garvin, David A. “How Google Sold Its Engineers on Management.” Harvard Business Review, 2013.
  2. Warne, R. T., Larsen, R. A. A., & Clark, J. “Low base rates and a high IQ selection threshold prevented Terman from identifying future Nobelists.” Intelligence, 2020.
  3. van Creveld, Martin. Fighting Power: German and U.S. Army Performance, 1939–1945. Greenwood Press, 1982.
Updated on Aug 3, 2025